This morning I received a message from an content website, which I won't name. They were telling me that they were excited to let me know that my content had been approved and that it was now stay. Getting the notice did not excite me. And I had already made the decision that I would never post an content to them again. After hearing the background, you may understand why. You will also learn how to select writing and submitting content websites for SEO purposes in the procedure.
The content had been posted over three months prior. Once I mailed support at this particular listing, I reminded them that the two weeks for assessing the submission was past. I also made it clear that I was assessing their ability to deliver on their guarantees before I considered paying for a top quality account.
A month later, the article was still pending. I emailed a second time asking when they were going to approve the article. I almost pulled the article, but after checking their author's guidelines, I realized that I could post the article on the blog I was setting up for the article's niche. I posted the article on the blog and decided to see how long they would take.
Why am I sharing this content listing story of woe?
When choosing which writing and submitting content websites you are going to post your well-written content on, you need to consider several factors. Even if an content listing shows up on a list of the "best content directories" online, there may be more you need to know before you post your content on that website. This website was in the top five on several lists.
In order to evaluate an article directory's quality, you need to do some research. Here are some important questions to ask.
Does the directory charge you a fee to post articles, or to get better service?
A piece of content listing should have a no cost option that allows you to see whether their listing produces the results you are looking for. In exchange for not having to pay anything, you should anticipate the evaluation procedure to take anywhere from seven times to 14 times.
If an article directory doesn't have your article submissions live within the time frame it promises, how can you trust the directory's word that it only accepts the highest quality articles? If a directory is so swamped that it can't review free submissions in a timely manner, then there is a real risk that anyone who is willing to pay the membership fee will get their 24 hour review at the expense of quality.
It is my opinion that an article directory that requires authors to submit a minimum number of articles for review before an author is allowed to purchase "premium author" rights is a directory that is committed to ensuring that the work it publishes meets a certain standard. This is a practice that can prevent non-authors from gaming the system.
Are the content on the listing of excellent quality?
Generally, the fantastic of the material in an material record reveals the value of publishing on a record. You can predict every material record to have some material that slide through after an writer has obtained their professional writer place, or whatever headline the record gives to someone who has released a smallest extensive range of material for assessment. Sometimes writers let up after they've achieved "status."
What you are looking for are directories where the articles aren't advertisements, are well written and aren't stuffed with keywords. There are many who have good reputations. And the recent Google changes don't necessary reflect which ones these are. Skip around the site for different topics. If you find good content on each search term, then you are probably on a good article site.
Can articles be submitted without going through review?
Beware of sites that don't review your articles before they go live. A site that doesn't review the quality of submissions is potentially a site that Google will see as a "content farm." The best article sites are struggling with Google's latest "farm" algorithms. Don't expect sites that don't monitor the quality of their material to help you with long-term positive SEO goals.
Does the directory require your submissions to be your original work?
It should. Some directories go so far as to require you to have never published your article anywhere else on the internet. This services the directory well by giving it link supremacy with Google.
If you are seeking primary link authority, then you may prefer to use directories that allow you to publish your article as a blog post as well as submit it for publication on their article site. Which strategy works best for you will depend on where you expect to get your most traffic from. For some businesses, a blog needs to be a primary SEO strategy, while for others article marketing is more successful at generating leads. If your primary focus is B2B then the blog may be your best strategy unless you can publish articles in trade journals. For a B2C company, article marketing can be very successful.
In either situation, it is important that the globally web internet directories you publish to do not accept plr material and do NOT accept enhanced material (even of your own articles). You should only publish your material to on the internet internet directories that predict you to provide material with new and clean material.
The fantastic of the composing and publishing material sites you choose to execute with chooses the long-term achievements of your material marketing initiatives. Don't negotiate for anything but on the internet internet directories that complete the testing offered when you response these issues.
The content had been posted over three months prior. Once I mailed support at this particular listing, I reminded them that the two weeks for assessing the submission was past. I also made it clear that I was assessing their ability to deliver on their guarantees before I considered paying for a top quality account.
A month later, the article was still pending. I emailed a second time asking when they were going to approve the article. I almost pulled the article, but after checking their author's guidelines, I realized that I could post the article on the blog I was setting up for the article's niche. I posted the article on the blog and decided to see how long they would take.
Why am I sharing this content listing story of woe?
When choosing which writing and submitting content websites you are going to post your well-written content on, you need to consider several factors. Even if an content listing shows up on a list of the "best content directories" online, there may be more you need to know before you post your content on that website. This website was in the top five on several lists.
In order to evaluate an article directory's quality, you need to do some research. Here are some important questions to ask.
Does the directory charge you a fee to post articles, or to get better service?
A piece of content listing should have a no cost option that allows you to see whether their listing produces the results you are looking for. In exchange for not having to pay anything, you should anticipate the evaluation procedure to take anywhere from seven times to 14 times.
If an article directory doesn't have your article submissions live within the time frame it promises, how can you trust the directory's word that it only accepts the highest quality articles? If a directory is so swamped that it can't review free submissions in a timely manner, then there is a real risk that anyone who is willing to pay the membership fee will get their 24 hour review at the expense of quality.
It is my opinion that an article directory that requires authors to submit a minimum number of articles for review before an author is allowed to purchase "premium author" rights is a directory that is committed to ensuring that the work it publishes meets a certain standard. This is a practice that can prevent non-authors from gaming the system.
Are the content on the listing of excellent quality?
Generally, the fantastic of the material in an material record reveals the value of publishing on a record. You can predict every material record to have some material that slide through after an writer has obtained their professional writer place, or whatever headline the record gives to someone who has released a smallest extensive range of material for assessment. Sometimes writers let up after they've achieved "status."
What you are looking for are directories where the articles aren't advertisements, are well written and aren't stuffed with keywords. There are many who have good reputations. And the recent Google changes don't necessary reflect which ones these are. Skip around the site for different topics. If you find good content on each search term, then you are probably on a good article site.
Can articles be submitted without going through review?
Beware of sites that don't review your articles before they go live. A site that doesn't review the quality of submissions is potentially a site that Google will see as a "content farm." The best article sites are struggling with Google's latest "farm" algorithms. Don't expect sites that don't monitor the quality of their material to help you with long-term positive SEO goals.
Does the directory require your submissions to be your original work?
It should. Some directories go so far as to require you to have never published your article anywhere else on the internet. This services the directory well by giving it link supremacy with Google.
If you are seeking primary link authority, then you may prefer to use directories that allow you to publish your article as a blog post as well as submit it for publication on their article site. Which strategy works best for you will depend on where you expect to get your most traffic from. For some businesses, a blog needs to be a primary SEO strategy, while for others article marketing is more successful at generating leads. If your primary focus is B2B then the blog may be your best strategy unless you can publish articles in trade journals. For a B2C company, article marketing can be very successful.
In either situation, it is important that the globally web internet directories you publish to do not accept plr material and do NOT accept enhanced material (even of your own articles). You should only publish your material to on the internet internet directories that predict you to provide material with new and clean material.
The fantastic of the composing and publishing material sites you choose to execute with chooses the long-term achievements of your material marketing initiatives. Don't negotiate for anything but on the internet internet directories that complete the testing offered when you response these issues.
About the Author:
Want to find out more about Articles Directory, then visit Arun Kumar's site on how to choose the best Unique Articles for your needs.
0 comments